PulseForge AI Logo PulseForge AI
[VERIFIED SCENARIO GUIDE] Vector: VRAM-ENVELOPE-GUARD

24GB vs 48GB GPU VRAM Sizing for Local Coding Agents & Vector RAG

DIRECT ANSWER: Sizing quantized Q4_K_M local inference alongside embedded LanceDB or Qdrant keeps total concurrent memory inside a single 24GB workstation GPU with zero cloud egress.

Deterministic Token-Entropy & Cost Remediation Matrix

MetricUnindexed BaselineHardened (Progressive CLAUDE.md + Router)
Trigger SymptomOOM crashes when running 32B coding models alongside local embedding & vector indexes on 24GB GPUsEliminated (-58% to -64% Discovery Waste)
Context Tokens / Turn24,500 tokens/turn9,600 tokens/turn
5-Engineer Net Monthly SavingsUncapped Overage Exposure+$390.00/mo Saved ($4,680.00/yr)
1-Tap Verdict & TCO Simulator Select your primary engineering priority:
Team Size:
✓ ACTIVE VERDICT: llama.cpp Q4_K_M + LanceDB / Qdrant + 8k KV-Cache Cap (Saves ~$312/mo for 5 Devs with valkey-cluster.prod.conf + Root CLAUDE.md)

Sizing quantized Q4_K_M local inference alongside embedded LanceDB or Qdrant keeps total concurrent memory inside a single 24GB workstation GPU with zero cloud egress.

Specimen #1 Unmasked Preview (`valkey-cluster.prod.conf` + `CLAUDE.md`) & Locked 9-File Production Deliverables ▾✓ P99 Load-Tested + Production Docker/Helm Audited • 30-Day Instant Refund Guarantee
# Specimen 01 Preview (llama.cpp Q4_K_M + LanceDB / Qdrant + 8k KV-Cache Cap • ggml-org/llama.cpp • 5 Devs):
+ [valkey-cluster.prod.conf] healthcheck: 5s | restart: unless-stopped | mem_limit: 2g (Production HA Spec)
+ [Verdict TCO] ggml-org/llama.cpp | route_65_35_cache: true | cap: $188/mo (Saves ~$312/mo)
valkey-cluster.prod.conf (HA Stack) helm-values.prod.yaml + terraform.tf prometheus-alerts.yml (SLO Gate) promptfooconfig.yaml (50-Probe OWASP)
1-Tap Engineering Poll (Optional)

What is your main goal while comparing llama.cpp Q4_K_M + LanceDB / Qdrant + 8k KV-Cache Cap and its alternatives today?